Friday, January 30, 2009

She is not for petting

This will turn into a rant I’m sure, but I just want to say it before it goes too far.

I tend to avoid girls that have never been kissed. I am a very affectionate guy and I like having an affectionate girl and you don’t usually get that from a girl that has never been kissed. Usually a girl that has never been kissed is in that stage for two reasons: 1. Lack of opportunity (i.e. she was home schooled, only wanted to kiss Mormon boys and there weren’t a whole lot where she lived or she was an awkward kind of teen and boys didn’t know how to approach her) or 2. Not that affectionate. (i.e. some girls just don’t like to be touched. I’m not sure why this is.)

(Reason 1 I can work through on those days when I’m feeling patient. Teaching a girl how to be a good kisser is a drawn out process and you really have to be patient on how to teach her while not offending her while also making it enjoyable. For those who have ever struggled at getting pregnant can tell you – after a while of practicing the same thing over and over again is annoying. But sometimes you just have to do that with a girl before she can move onto the next step in being a good kisser. In part – this is why I prefer a girl whose lips have had one before. Someone already trained her and I can then work on perfecting those lessons. This is also why I tend to stay away from girls that had been kissed by 20 different guys. Usually at that point – they’ve had too many teachers with too many agendas. For reason 2, I really haven’t found a cure and there really is no end to the misery that type of girl will cause you.)

However, once I’ve found a girl that is affectionate, I must admit I am a private individual. I think that anything beyond holding hands should be reserved for the privacy of your own secret sacred place (whether that be your couch, bedroom, truck, Teton Dam, in the backwoods of Yellowstone National Park, or any where else where you and your companion can be alone and friendly.) Being affectionate is a way of showing appreciation for the person and body you are with. It should not be used to dictate ownership or control or possession or to make people in your congregation at church feel bitter or nauseas.

(and this is where it turns into a rant)

At church on Sunday there were 8 new couples. (which is great news for me because it means Bishop will stop pestering me to date those girls.) 7 of the couples were so cute and respectful. I have no clue what they are doing on the dining room table or at the park near their house. They held hands or loosely strung their arms around their companion as they sat in the pew. And then there was 8th couple. They were constantly grabbing and touching each other. If he didn’t have two hands on her at all time it was because he was changing positions. After Sacrament they each had people to talk to but this did not mean they were bound for separation. Instead they remained locked in hand and standing back to back. Then at one point the guy was holding her elbow as she shook hands with someone. Her ELBOW!!
We get it. We ALL get it. You like each other. You think we all need to know you like each other. You need each other to know you really like each other. But, please, stop. Save your affectionate for the car, the couch or the honeymoon suite. Not touching in public won’t weaken our faith in your relationship. It will just allow us to stomach your relationship more.

5 comments:

Cindy said...

LOL! I once visited a friend's ward with a high percentage of newlyweds. It was definitely a little nauseating! But I am also laughing at your descriptions of girls who have/haven't been kissed. And glad that my homeschooled daughter was able to find herself a husband without having been kissed before college!

Oh--Cindy Lynn can tell you that at our house the secret sacred place starts in the kitchen. Really--that's where we spend most of our time, why shouldn't we get to hug and kiss in there? Our friends and their kids are trained to look the other way. ;)

Sean said...

Home schooled girls just take patience. Most them are eager to learn (after only having had one teacher for a majority of their lives, a new teacher is a blessing beyond measure). The biggest problem with a home schooled girl is lack of media. For some reason - a lot of home schooling families also limit the media that comes into the home as well and so the girl hasn't seen a lot of kissing except from parents. So I have found it is helpful in teaching home schooled girls how to be affectionate and kissers by viewing movies like "Never been kissed" and "Princess Bride" with them while cuddling on a couch with a TV or the back of a pick up truck with a laptop. (I happen to own both.) This accomplishes two tasks at one time. The girl gets some cuddle time in (allowing her the ability to get comfortable with that type of affection) and it is instructional as it allows the girl to see good kissing before acting on that pinicale crowning action herself. It really is a win win for her.

(I used to show "Hitch" and "50 First Dates", but both of those have a level of affection in them that are really reserved for marriage and I don't want an uneducated girl to get the wrong idea of where the affection will lead. Basic rules of thumb such as "Your hands should never go above the knee or below the neck" and "All four feet should remain on the ground" are ignored whole heartily in Hitch and 50. That is why I tend to keep to Princess and Never.)

In the end - the importance in being an undereducated lacking affectionate kind of girl is to having a winning personality. I dated a girl for a whole two years that was very much against the idea of being extremely affectionate, but what she lacked in the physical she made up for with a great personality. We never seemed to be without something new or interesting or funny to discuss. I loved that about her. I was a whole lot more willing to be patient with her learning affection because she was so worth it on a mental and spiritual level. If she had been as dumb as a sack of rocks though...well then I probably wouldn't have taken the time to teach physically and be taught mentally and spiritually.

Sean said...

Oh, and that girl I dated for 2 years - we weren't overly affectionate at church. Church is not a place for being overly affectionate unless it is you affectionly worshiping your God. We saved our affection for picnics, movies, service projects (we went to the temple once a week - I always kissed her as we exited.), and time "hanging out" at home. It was not right to be making out or convieving a kid on the pew. The chapel is not a place for foreplay.

cindy baldwin said...

I would like to state for the record:

The reason that my first kiss was in college had nothing to do with me being homeschooled. Had I wanted to, I can think of at least 2 guys who could have taken me out of the VL club in high school. I waited till college out of my own personal desire to wait for a relationship till college, and to save my kisses accordingly.

I might have to send this post to Mahon. His favorite game right now is "make Cindy turn red in public." I don't mind a little hand holding or a quick peck on the lips, but I'm not really fond of PDA. He thinks it's hilarious. I could tell you a really great story about an elevator sometime...

Sean said...

So CLB, what you are saying is that you were in the Reason 2 crowd in high school.
(Why is it we've latched onto the home schooling thing?)

You could share the elavator story here. No one reads this blog.